Not only did he have vitiligo, but he also had lupus. If you don’t know what that is, please do some research–it’s a pretty awful condition, and it’s the reason he never went anywhere without an umbrella toward the end of his life.
Put yourself in his shoes: imagine you are quite literally most famous person in the world; you have cameras in your face ANY time you leave your home, and you have two diseases that seriously impact your physical appearance and health. In a world where people obsess about appearance, vitiligo would have ended his career. Ive always thought the right handed glove made it painfully clear he was covering something. Likely a depigmentation patch now that we know. How would any of you handle it? Everybody who thinks Micheal Jackson was such a ‘wacko’ has NO IDEA what living his life would have been like, nor do you understand how that would impact a person mentally. Many of us just had acne or bad hair when we were teens/young twenties. It turned many of us into self-conscious, basement dwelling redditors. Imagine if you had to be in the public eye under unbelievable scrutiny at that age, in all your flaws and insecurities. Would you try to hide them? Could you even deal with it? Could you handle those pressures and still go on to become (arguably) the greatest entertainer to ever live?
Now for a second, also imagine that you dedicated much of your life to trying to help sick children, including donating huge amounts of money and building them a fucking amusement park on your own land, and then the entire world suddenly believes you are in fact a child molester. How would you live with that? Assume for a second that he really was innocent (and if you research that too, you will not find a shred of evidence that ever supported any of the accusations against him). That destroyed Michael. You can see how he got more and more reclusive and withdrawn after that happened. Could you show your face every day in public when half the world hates you and thinks you have a sick game where you lure in cancer-stricken children and molest them? Michael didn’t turn himself into a monster, society did.
Nobody can even begin to understand what the stresses of his life were like. Like any person who is beyond greatness, Michael was lifted up by people to ridiculous idolatry (which was no fault of his own), and then torn down with the same passion when everyone turned on him. Everybody’s expectations of him would have ruined any other person too. Frankly, I think he was unbelievably tough mentally to survive as long as he did and deal with the shitstorm that his life turned into, because of people that judged him for the consequences of his life’s circumstances that he had little control over.
Be glad that none of you ever had to have the pigment of your lips tattooed on, just so you could look like less of a freak (due to a disease you didnt ask for), because everywhere you went you had zoom lenses in your face, trying their damnedest to make you look as monstrous as possible. And, to put that in perspective, that was probably the least of the worries he had to deal with on a daily basis in his life.
While I have the podium, I’d also like to politely request that people who are steadfastly convinced that Mr. Jackson molested children spend a few minutes to read some Wikipedia.
No substantial evidence was ever found in regards to any of the child molestation charges, and if you read more about the accusers you will find that their credibility should seriously be called into question.
Some of the people involved in this case seemed to have a personal vendetta against Michael Jackson, and if they had any way to convict him with substantial evidence for criminal charges, they certainly would have.
As my closing comment, I pose one last bit of thought: if you were a parent, and your child had been molested by a man posing as someone trying to help sick children, would you be satisfied with money and disappear? Or, do you think you might pursue criminal charges to make sure the person was locked away and could do no more harm?
Please everyone, realize that these kinds of snap-judgments about others happen every. single. day. They happen to celebrities, friends, family, and people we don’t know at all. And these judgments by others hurt people, ruin people, and sometimes drive people to kill others or themselves.
Once a large group decides on a negative perspective, it can be extremely difficult or impossible to shift the tide in the opposite direction. It feels so much safer for us all to join the popular opinion and feel like part of a group, but it’s much better for humanity in general if we resist this urge and try to form rational, reasoned opinions for ourselves, and not immediately jump on our instincts when forming ideas about others.
Even if you still dislike Michael Jackson as a person, or you think he was guilty, a lot of his songs were about loving others, and I think this is a message we can all buy into. Please be careful about the opinions you form, and if their only basis is that somebody else said them too, please give some reflection into why you really believe them. Nobody deserves to be hated only because they’re different, eccentric, or it just happens to be the popular opinion.
I think the truth of human nature in regards to people like Michael is that we forget they are human at all. So many of the hateful things said about him, even in this thread, are criticisms that we would never wage against someone we understood to be flawed like the rest of us.
Any time a person rises to exceptional greatness, human nature can’t help but see them as something more than human. They become society’s idols; people that others with common lives look up to as some superior, glowing, shiny piece of perfection. We lose our capacity to understand that they are fragile like the rest of us, because we are too busy projecting our ideals of perfection on them to make up for our own personal deficiencies.
We live our fantasy ideals of life vicariously through people like this, with all sorts of insane expectations that continue to multiply in order to satisfy our need for a perfect idol. Each person demands something unique and different from this poor celebrity figure, and they fail to realize that their entire concept of the person is based on what they WANT them to be, instead of who they actually are.
This is, of course, completely unsustainable, and it’s why so often people who are raised to these heights eventually get torn back down by the same people who originally built them up. People get upset when they realize they can’t have their idol; when they realize they are actually not connected to them; when they realize their projections and expectations are not being met, and they are in fact as far removed as possible from this person–their standard of perfection.
Then the childish anger and backlash ensues. People recognize the disparity between themselves and the celebrity, and instead of feeling connected to the person as they previously did, their deficiencies compared to that person get magnified. In a sweeping tide, all of those who are common people see the threat of someone who has somehow floated to heights they will never be able to attain, and they rally together in unity to tear them back down. They cannot handle the reality of someone being so revered, and cannot rectify it with their own lack of fame and insignificance, so they band together to destroy them and act as though they never liked them at all.
The really messed up facet of this piece of human nature is that the poor celebrity is really just an innocent bystander in this whole mess. They never asked to be revered as something more than human, and the pressures of being in this position often makes them do things they wouldn’t otherwise have done because the stress makes them crack.
It’s all just a delusional mindset created by average people who know they lack anything that will separate them from the crowd, so they live out their fantasy projected onto someone else. These masses then react negatively when they finally see the reality of their existence: they are only remarkable in how remarkably average they are.